"I was very skeptical about this first time. I just
didn't know how can an online service provide me the cheapest rate
insurance. But I was wrong. I filled up only one form and
got several responses via email. No Phone call, no sales pitch. I
had my health insurance and saved $45/month. This was amazing. I
strongly recommend to all"- Jean Z, Omaha, NE
More
Is Insurance Healthy? Can
You Afford to Pay Medical Bills?
Five years ago, average health insurance premium was equivalent of a car
payment, now it's more like a mortgage. More and more people are faced
with a tough choice: indefinitely postpone their next visit to the doctor
or start depleting retirement savings in order to pay medical bills.
There should be a better way to keep our families healthy...
Let's begin with terminology. The generally accepted definition of an
"insurable event" - be it a traffic accident, a house fire, or an
earthquake - is something that
(a) comes without warning;
(b) is very unlikely to happen and
(c) is definitely undesirable.
Now try to apply this definition to any routine health maintenance event
like teeth cleaning or annual physical and you will discover that the very
term HEALTH INSURANCE contains a built-in contradiction.
From financial considerations, any INSURANCE system works best when the
fewest number of participants actually use it (i.e. make claims). This way
an insurer makes profit and is able to lower the premium which, in turn,
brings more paying participants who are happy NOT TO USE the insurance,
especially if it does not cost them too much. Remember, we are talking
about real insurance and truly "insurable event" - something that is
definitely undesirable. On the contrary, the HEALTH CARE system works best
when the most people use it (i.e. get checkups, tests and vaccinations).
The financial structure and goals of the two systems are incompatible.
It was in an attempt to reconcile these differences that the concept of
managed care was developed. Unfortunately, that system satisfies nobody.
It enrages health care practitioners and consumers alike when it limits or
denies payments on the grounds that the particular treatment or service is
not medically necessary. It also frustrates insurers by mandating payment
for routine services, whether they are really necessary or not.
There's another basic problem with the current system: it's the assumption
that health care is a benefit of employment. So if you are unemployed,
self-employed or employed by someone who lacks the negotiating power of
big businesses - health insurance is not for you. Even if one has an
employer provided coverage, recent premium hikes can price him/her out of
the range of affordable health insurance. Why? Unlike virtually any other
commodity, contracts for health care services are negotiated not by the
affected parties (physicians, hospitals and consumers) but by insurers and
employers.
The list goes on, but even without considering numerous other "symptoms"
it should be clear by now that the current fundamentally irrational HEALTH
INSURANCE system is designed for conflicts and lawsuits rather than
providing the best health care at the best prices.
So, is there a common-sense solution to this crisis? The answer is YES,
but it's not universal. The right solution for you and for me may vary due
to the different circumstances, health care needs and risk tolerance. It
is important to realize, though, that each of us should be able find that
optimal balance!
To begin with, we must recognize that we are dealing with two different
levels of health care needs and must cover those needs with two separate
tiers of payment. One level is catastrophic illness - and for that,
insurance is the answer. Policies that carry a high deductible (say,
$5,000 a year) are relatively inexpensive, even when the coverage is very
high ($1 million or more) or unlimited. That is because most people do not
get catastrophic illnesses or injuries.
The second level comprises health maintenance and routine medical
procedures. For these, insurance is not the answer. Instead, there are two
alternatives. One is for people to pay these costs out of pocket, the way
we now pay for many other routine needs. There are number of benefits to
this approach, including no managed care and less paperwork. For many
people, coming up with the cash to pay routine medical bills, especially
if they know that any major illness or injury would trigger a backup
insurance plan, would not be difficult.
For others, however, it would. Fortunately, back in the 1980s, the idea of
so-called patient advocacy via health care savings programs was born. The
availability and popularity of these programs is picking up year after
year, as more and more people, unable to get or afford health insurance,
are discovering them for the first time. These programs negotiate prices
with health care providers on behalf of their members. Since they
represent large groups, the resulting discounts are usually the same that
the hospitals and physicians give to big insurance companies. But this is
where the similarity with old health insurance model
ends.
With health care savings program, it's a patient, not an insurance
company, who pays the bill. This seemingly minor adjustment makes a world
of difference. It benefits medical providers because they get paid "on the
spot" without enormous paperwork and disputes with insurance companies. It
also benefits individual consumers who get access to the discounted
"insurance rates" without having to pay high premiums. Yet most
importantly, the entire system appears to be financially sound and
socially viable.
Unlike traditional insurance model, the patient advocacy actually
encourages people to seek medical help as soon as the need arises thus
preventing "little aches" form developing into life- threatening illnesses
and financial disasters. Monthly membership fee is affordable and no one
can be turned down because of a pre- existing condition. Many of such
programs also allow their members to contribute money to medical savings
accounts. Federal law makes this an attractive option, because medical
savings accounts are tax deductible or not taxable, as long as the funds
are used to pay for health care.
Five years from now, average health insurance premium may well exceed a
car payment and a mortgage payment combined together. There is, however, a
way to keep our families healthy without jeopardizing financial security.
This writing was intended to assist the reader in finding that right
solution by providing a better understanding of the ever-changing
situation and available options.